[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190703215118.GI3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 23:51:18 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de, mingo@...nel.org,
luto@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, jgross@...e.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhe.he@...driver.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, devel@...ukata.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/mm, tracing: Fix CR2 corruption
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 04:29:42PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 22:22:31 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 12:27:34PM +0200, root wrote:
> > > Despire the current efforts to read CR2 before tracing happens there
> > > still exist a number of possible holes:
> > >
> > > idtentry page_fault do_page_fault has_error_code=1
> > > call error_entry
> > > TRACE_IRQS_OFF
> > > call trace_hardirqs_off*
> > > #PF // modifies CR2
> > >
> > > CALL_enter_from_user_mode
> > > __context_tracking_exit()
> > > trace_user_exit(0)
> > > #PF // modifies CR2
> > >
> > > call do_page_fault
> > > address = read_cr2(); /* whoopsie */
> > >
> > > And similar for i386.
> > >
> > > Fix it by pulling the CR2 read into the entry code, before any of that
> > > stuff gets a chance to run and ruin things.
> > >
> > > Ideally we'll clean up the entry code by moving this tracing and
> > > context tracking nonsense into C some day, but let's not delay fixing
> > > this longer.
> > >
> >
> > > @@ -1180,10 +1189,10 @@ idtentry xenint3 do_int3 has_error_co
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > idtentry general_protection do_general_protection has_error_code=1
> > > -idtentry page_fault do_page_fault has_error_code=1
> > > +idtentry page_fault do_page_fault has_error_code=1 read_cr2=1
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GUEST
> > > -idtentry async_page_fault do_async_page_fault has_error_code=1
> > > +idtentry async_page_fault do_async_page_fault has_error_code=1 read_cr2=1
> > > #endif
> >
> > While going over the various idt handlers, I found that we probably also
> > need read_cr2 on do_double_fault(), otherwise it is susceptible to the
> > same problem.
> >
>
> BTW, do you plan on making this for stable? Even though it's rather
> invasive. Or should we just apply the band-aids first, have them
> backported to stable, and then put this change on top of them for
> upstream?
So I don't particularly care about stable; and the band-aids
(trace_irqs_off_cr2) is known broken so I really don't see the point.
That said, these patches should apply to most recent kernels (post PTI)
without too much rejects.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists