[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190703014808.GC6852@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:48:08 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>,
Eric Saint-Etienne <eric.saint.etienne@...cle.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] perf: Fix errors detected by Smatch
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 06:34:09PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > When I used static checker Smatch for perf building, the main target is
> > to check if there have any potential issues in Arm cs-etm code. So
> > finally I get many reporting for errors/warnings.
> >
> > I used below command for using static checker with perf building:
> >
> > # make VF=1 CORESIGHT=1 -C tools/perf/ \
> > CHECK="/root/Work/smatch/smatch --full-path" \
> > CC=/root/Work/smatch/cgcc | tee smatch_reports.txt
> >
> > I reviewed the errors one by one, if I understood some of these errors
> > so changed the code as I can, this patch set is the working result; but
> > still leave some errors due to I don't know what's the best way to fix
> > it. There also have many inconsistent indenting warnings. So I firstly
> > send out this patch set and let's see what's the feedback from public
> > reviewing.
> >
> > Leo Yan (11):
> > perf report: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > perf stat: Smatch: Fix use-after-freed pointer
> > perf top: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > perf annotate: Smatch: Fix dereferencing freed memory
> > perf trace: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > perf hists: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > perf map: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > perf session: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > perf intel-bts: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > perf intel-pt: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > perf cs-etm: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
>
> from quick look it all looks good to me, nice tool ;-)
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Thanks for reviewing, Jiri.
@Arnaldo, Just want to check, will you firstly pick up 01~05, 07,
08/11 patches if you think they are okay? Or you want to wait me to
spin new patch set with all patches after I gather all comments?
Thanks,
Leo Yan
> > tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 4 ++--
> > tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 2 +-
> > tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 8 ++++++--
> > tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 5 +++--
> > tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 13 +++++++++----
> > tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 6 ++----
> > tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 2 +-
> > tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c | 5 ++---
> > tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c | 5 ++---
> > tools/perf/util/map.c | 7 +++++--
> > tools/perf/util/session.c | 3 +++
> > 11 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists