[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190702232459.GA14941@archlinux-epyc>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:24:59 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: Fix dead assignment of old_pte
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 04:13:02PM -0700, 'Nathan Huckleberry' via Clang Built Linux wrote:
> When analyzed with the clang static analyzer the
> following warning occurs
>
> line 251, column 2
> Value stored to 'old_pte' is never read
>
> This warning is repeated every time pgtable.h is
> included by another file and produces ~3500
> extra warnings.
>
> Moving old_pte into preprocessor guard.
>
> Cc: clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index fca26759081a..42ca4fc67f27 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -238,8 +238,6 @@ extern void __sync_icache_dcache(pte_t pteval);
> static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
> {
> - pte_t old_pte;
> -
> if (pte_present(pte) && pte_user_exec(pte) && !pte_special(pte))
> __sync_icache_dcache(pte);
>
> @@ -248,8 +246,11 @@ static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> * hardware updates of the pte (ptep_set_access_flags safely changes
> * valid ptes without going through an invalid entry).
> */
> + #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)
> + pte_t old_pte;
> +
> old_pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM) && pte_valid(old_pte) && pte_valid(pte) &&
> + if (pte_valid(old_pte) && pte_valid(pte) &&
> (mm == current->active_mm || atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) > 1)) {
> VM_WARN_ONCE(!pte_young(pte),
> "%s: racy access flag clearing: 0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx",
> @@ -258,6 +259,7 @@ static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> "%s: racy dirty state clearing: 0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx",
> __func__, pte_val(old_pte), pte_val(pte));
> }
> + #endif
>
> set_pte(ptep, pte);
> }
> --
> 2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog
>
Hi Nathan,
This does not apply on -next because of https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/9b604722059039a1a3ff69fb8dfd024264046024.
I would get into the habit of testing -next to see if the warning is
present there first because someone may have independently fixed it
already (I'd be surprised if it wasn't fixed by that commit from a quick
glance).
Additionally, when I do apply this patch to mainline and build, I see
the following warning:
In file included from /home/nathan/cbl/linux/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
In file included from /home/nathan/cbl/linux/include/linux/arm_sdei.h:14:
In file included from /home/nathan/cbl/linux/include/acpi/ghes.h:5:
In file included from /home/nathan/cbl/linux/include/acpi/apei.h:9:
In file included from /home/nathan/cbl/linux/include/linux/acpi.h:34:
In file included from /home/nathan/cbl/linux/include/acpi/acpi_io.h:5:
In file included from /home/nathan/cbl/linux/include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from /home/nathan/cbl/linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:18:
/home/nathan/cbl/linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:250:8: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixing declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
pte_t old_pte;
^
1 warning generated.
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists