linux-kernel - Re: Reminder: 22 open syzbot bugs in perf subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190703041918.GB633@sol.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 21:19:18 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Reminder: 22 open syzbot bugs in perf subsystem

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:29:39AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> On 7/3/19 9:25 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:09:55AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/2/19 11:13 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Title:              possible deadlock in uprobe_clear_state
> >>> Last occurred:      164 days ago
> >>> Reported:           201 days ago
> >>> Branches:           Mainline
> >>> Dashboard link:     https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=a1ce9b3da349209c5085bb8c4fee753d68c3697f
> >>> Original thread:    https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/00000000000010a9fb057cd14174@google.com/T/#u
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately, this bug does not have a reproducer.
> >>>
> >>> No one replied to the original thread for this bug.
> >>>
> >>> If you fix this bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> >>>     Reported-by: syzbot+1068f09c44d151250c33@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> >>>
> >>> If you send any email or patch for this bug, please consider replying to the
> >>> original thread.  For the git send-email command to use, or tips on how to reply
> >>> if the thread isn't in your mailbox, see the "Reply instructions" at
> >>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000010a9fb057cd14174@google.com
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is false positive:
> >> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154925313012615&w=2
> >>
> > 
> > What do you mean "false positive"?  Your patch says there can be a deadlock.
> > Also, your patch hasn't been merged yet.  So doesn't it still need to be fixed?
> 
> Please see Oleg's reply to the patch:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154946017315554&w=2
> 
> """
> But this is false positive, right? if CPU1 calls update_ref_ctr() then
> either ->mm_users is already zero so binder_alloc_free_page()->mmget_not_zero()
> will fail, or the caller of update_ref_ctr() has a reference and thus
> binder_alloc_free_page()->mmput() can't trigger __mmput() ?
> """
> 

Even if it's a lockdep false positive you can't ignore it.  People rely on
lockdep to find bugs, and they will keep sending you bug reports.  So someone
has to fix something.  Did you see Oleg's suggestion to change mmput() to
mmput_async() in binder_alloc_free_page()?
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=155119805728815&w=2
If you believe that is the right fix, I can reassign this report to binder
subsystem and nag the binder maintainers instead...

- Eric