[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed599239-a6a2-1cc6-14ce-d5bb41e9170f@web.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 10:48:26 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Less function calls in show_pnfs()
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
>> @@ -749,11 +749,10 @@ static void show_sessions(struct seq_file *m, struct nfs_server *server) {}
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_1
>> static void show_pnfs(struct seq_file *m, struct nfs_server *server)
>> {
>> - seq_printf(m, ",pnfs=");
>> - if (server->pnfs_curr_ld)
>> - seq_printf(m, "%s", server->pnfs_curr_ld->name);
>> - else
>> - seq_printf(m, "not configured");
>> + seq_printf(m, ",pnfs=%s",
>> + server->pnfs_curr_ld
>> + ? server->pnfs_curr_ld->name
>> + : "not configured");
>
> Unreadable.
* Do you find any other source code formatting more readable
for the usage of the ternary operator?
* How do you think about the general software transformation possibility
(at this place)?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists