linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: add binding for the Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 PCIe PHYs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFBinCCWzLyhzVcqHR0RY9+cSqDZ3EdJEim8SP4Mr2Q3M=OKTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jul 2019 10:58:41 +0200
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: add binding for the Lantiq VRX200
 and ARX300 PCIe PHYs

Hi Rob,

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:34 AM Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:35 PM Martin Blumenstingl
> <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add the bindings for the PCIe PHY on Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 SoCs.
> > The IP block contains settings for the PHY and a PLL.
> > The PLL mode is configurable through a dedicated #phy-cell in .dts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml  | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h  | 11 +++
> >  2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..b7b222e772d0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> The preference is (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) for new bindings.
to make sure I understand this correctly:
the license is then only valid for the bindings - is it fine if the
driver uses GPL-2.0-only?

I don't have any datasheet for these SoCs so all my knowledge is based
on the GPL-2.0-only driver from the Lantiq board support package
(called "UGW").
the .yaml file is 100% my own work so I'm fine with having GPL-2.0 OR
BSD-2-Clause
however, that still has to be compatible with my driver, which I chose
to be GPL-2.0-only because that's the license from the Lantiq board
support package


Martin