linux-kernel - Re: ima: Replace two seq_printf() calls by seq_puts() in ima_show_template_data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6b7db918-8d0b-b280-91e4-c15e22451cfc@web.de>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jul 2019 11:33:22 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ima: Replace two seq_printf() calls by seq_puts() in
 ima_show_template_data_ascii()

> So this is probably just a minor performance improvement in a code
> path where it really doesn't matter.

I imagine that another small software adjustment can help a bit
to get nicer run time characteristics also at this place.


>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
>> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void ima_show_template_data_ascii(struct seq_file *m,
>>  	case DATA_FMT_DIGEST_WITH_ALGO:
>>  		buf_ptr = strnchr(field_data->data, buflen, ':');
>>  		if (buf_ptr != field_data->data)
>> -			seq_printf(m, "%s", field_data->data);
>> +			seq_puts(m, field_data->data);
>>
>>  		/* skip ':' and '\0' */
>>  		buf_ptr += 2;
>
> That code looks highly suspect!

Would you like to change this implementation detail any more?

Regards,
Markus