| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190703102814.GF6852@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:28:14 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>,
Eric Saint-Etienne <eric.saint.etienne@...cle.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/11] perf intel-pt: Smatch: Fix potential NULL
pointer dereference
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 11:00:32AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:35:54AM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:07:40PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > > On 2/07/19 1:34 PM, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > > Based on the following report from Smatch, fix the potential
> > > > NULL pointer dereference check.
> > >
> > > It never is NULL. Remove the NULL test if you want:
> > >
> > > - if (session->itrace_synth_opts && session->itrace_synth_opts->set) {
> > > + if (session->itrace_synth_opts->set) {
> > >
> > > But blindly making changes like below is questionable.
> >
> > Thanks for suggestions.
> >
> > I checked report and script commands, as you said, both command will
> > always set session->itrace_synth_opts. For these two commands, we can
> > safely remove the NULL test.
> >
> > Because perf tool contains many sub commands, so I don't have much
> > confidence it's very safe to remove the NULL test for all cases; e.g.
> > there have cases which will process aux trace buffer but without
> > itrace options; for this case, session->itrace_synth_opts might be NULL.
> >
> > For either way (remove NULL test or keep NULL test), I don't want to
> > introduce regression and extra efforts by my patch. So want to double
> > confirm with you for this :)
>
> Review is useful to ensure the chosen solution is correct but
> unless I missed something the non-regression reasoning here is easy
> easy. In its original form and despite the check, the code will
> always dereference session->itrace_synth_opts, therefore removing
> the check cannot makes things worse.
Fair point and it's smart to connect with function
itrace_synth_opts__set_default(). :)
Thanks, Daniel.
> PS Of course we do also have to check that
> itrace_synth_opts__set_default() isn't a macro... but it isn't.
>
>
> > > > tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:3200
> > > > intel_pt_process_auxtrace_info() error: we previously assumed
> > > > 'session->itrace_synth_opts' could be null (see line 3196)
> > > >
> > > > tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:3206
> > > > intel_pt_process_auxtrace_info() warn: variable dereferenced before
> > > > check 'session->itrace_synth_opts' (see line 3200)
> > > >
> > > > tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
> > > > 3196 if (session->itrace_synth_opts && session->itrace_synth_opts->set) {
> > > > 3197 pt->synth_opts = *session->itrace_synth_opts;
> > > > 3198 } else {
> > > > 3199 itrace_synth_opts__set_default(&pt->synth_opts,
> > > > 3200 session->itrace_synth_opts->default_no_sample);
> > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > 3201 if (!session->itrace_synth_opts->default_no_sample &&
> > > > 3202 !session->itrace_synth_opts->inject) {
> > > > 3203 pt->synth_opts.branches = false;
> > > > 3204 pt->synth_opts.callchain = true;
> > > > 3205 }
> > > > 3206 if (session->itrace_synth_opts)
> > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > 3207 pt->synth_opts.thread_stack =
> > > > 3208 session->itrace_synth_opts->thread_stack;
> > > > 3209 }
> > > >
> > > > To dismiss the potential NULL pointer dereference, this patch validates
> > > > the pointer 'session->itrace_synth_opts' before access its elements.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c | 5 ++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
> > > > index 550db6e77968..88b567bdf1f9 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
> > > > @@ -3195,7 +3195,7 @@ int intel_pt_process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event,
> > > >
> > > > if (session->itrace_synth_opts && session->itrace_synth_opts->set) {
> > > > pt->synth_opts = *session->itrace_synth_opts;
> > > > - } else {
> > > > + } else if (session->itrace_synth_opts) {
> > > > itrace_synth_opts__set_default(&pt->synth_opts,
> > > > session->itrace_synth_opts->default_no_sample);
> > > > if (!session->itrace_synth_opts->default_no_sample &&
> > > > @@ -3203,8 +3203,7 @@ int intel_pt_process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event,
> > > > pt->synth_opts.branches = false;
> > > > pt->synth_opts.callchain = true;
> > > > }
> > > > - if (session->itrace_synth_opts)
> > > > - pt->synth_opts.thread_stack =
> > > > + pt->synth_opts.thread_stack =
> > > > session->itrace_synth_opts->thread_stack;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists