lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:43:38 +0200
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To:     "Sa, Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>
Cc:     "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "kernel@...tin.sperl.org" <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sbranden@...adcom.com" <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        "wahrenst@....net" <wahrenst@....net>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "eric@...olt.net" <eric@...olt.net>,
        "rjui@...adcom.com" <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-bcm2835.c: Fix 3-wire mode

On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:21:21PM +0000, Sa, Nuno wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 13:55 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > I see.  In that case, try:
> > 
> >  	/* handle all the 3-wire mode */
> > -	if ((spi->mode & SPI_3WIRE) && (tfr->rx_buf))
> > +	if ((spi->mode & SPI_3WIRE) && (tfr->rx_buf != ctlr->dummy_rx))
> >  		cs |= BCM2835_SPI_CS_REN;
> >  	else
> >  		cs &= ~BCM2835_SPI_CS_REN;
> 
> This worked fine. Also, I did a quick backport of the state of your
> driver's (both spi-bcm2835 and bcm2835-dma) in revpi_staging and it
> also worked fine with my device.
> So, as far as I understand, the above suggestion (or my patch) is not
> intended to be upstreamed, right? It is just a temporary fix that I can
> use while your patchset gets upstream.

Thanks for testing.  I've just submitted the above as a fix for 5.3.
(Actually with a small change, the check for (tfr->rx_buf) needs to
be preserved in case DMA is disabled.)

The patch can be backported to 5.2 and older stable kernels if "ctlr"
is replaced by "master", we can inform Greg about that once the patch
lands in Linus' tree.  And I've amended my patch set to revert this
patch when dropping MUST_RX.

Thanks,

Lukas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ