[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190703114625.GG6852@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 19:46:25 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf, libbpf: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer
dereference
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 12:23:05PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 07/02/2019 12:25 PM, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Based on the following report from Smatch, fix the potential
> > NULL pointer dereference check.
> >
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c:3493
> > bpf_prog_load_xattr() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'attr'
> > (see line 3483)
> >
> > 3479 int bpf_prog_load_xattr(const struct bpf_prog_load_attr *attr,
> > 3480 struct bpf_object **pobj, int *prog_fd)
> > 3481 {
> > 3482 struct bpf_object_open_attr open_attr = {
> > 3483 .file = attr->file,
> > 3484 .prog_type = attr->prog_type,
> > ^^^^^^
> > 3485 };
> >
> > At the head of function, it directly access 'attr' without checking if
> > it's NULL pointer. This patch moves the values assignment after
> > validating 'attr' and 'attr->file'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index 197b574406b3..809b633fa3d9 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -3479,10 +3479,7 @@ int bpf_prog_load(const char *file, enum bpf_prog_type type,
> > int bpf_prog_load_xattr(const struct bpf_prog_load_attr *attr,
> > struct bpf_object **pobj, int *prog_fd)
> > {
> > - struct bpf_object_open_attr open_attr = {
> > - .file = attr->file,
> > - .prog_type = attr->prog_type,
> > - };
>
> Applied, thanks! Fyi, I retained the zeroing of open_attr as otherwise if we ever
> extend struct bpf_object_open_attr in future, we'll easily miss this and pass in
> garbage to bpf_object__open_xattr().
Thanks for the info, Daniel.
I checked the link [1] and thanks for the improvement when applied this
patch.
Thanks,
Leo Yan
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=33bae185f74d49a0d7b1bfaafb8e959efce0f243
Powered by blists - more mailing lists