| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <8898674D84E3B24BA3A2D289B872026A78BA95D6@G01JPEXMBKW03>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:04:11 +0000
From: "Zhang, Lei" <zhang.lei@...fujitsu.com>
To: 'Viresh Kumar' <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Okamoto, Takayuki" <tokamoto@...fujitsu.com>,
"Mizuma, Masayoshi" <masayoshi.mizuma@...itsu.com>,
"Indoh, Takao" <indou.takao@...itsu.com>,
"Zhang, Lei" <zhang.lei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3] KVM: arm64: Implement vq_present() as a macro
Hi guys,
I can't start up KVM guest os with SVE feature with your patch.
The error message is
qemu-system-aarch64: kvm_init_vcpu failed: Invalid argument.
My test enviroment.
kernel linux-5.2-rc6
qemu [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/14] target/arm/kvm: enable SVE in guests https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg04945.html
KVM start up option
-machine virt,gic-version=host,accel=kvm \
-cpu host \
-machine type=virt \
-nographic \
-smp 16 \ -m 4096 \
-drive if=none,file=/root/image.qcow2,id=hd0,format=qcow2 \
-device virtio-blk-device,drive=hd0 \
-netdev user,id=mynet0,restrict=off,hostfwd=tcp::38001-:22 \
-device virtio-net-device,netdev=mynet0 \
-bios /root/QEMU_EFI.fd
sve_vq_available function's return value' type is bool.
But vq_present is macro, so the value is not only TRUE, FALSE but also some numbers.
So It failed at
if (vq_present(vqs, vq) != sve_vq_available(vq)).
I think it is nessary to make vq_present macro's value only TRUE and FALSE.
arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
static int set_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
for (vq = SVE_VQ_MIN; vq <= max_vq; ++vq)
if (vq_present(vqs, vq) != sve_vq_available(vq)) // It failed at here.
return -EINVAL;
My patch as follows.
I have started up KVM guest os successfully with SVE feature with this patch.
Could you review and merge my patch?
Signed-off-by: Zhang Lei <zhang.lei@...fujitsu.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c index c2afa79..dfd6264 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
#define vq_word(vq) (((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) / 64) #define vq_mask(vq) ((u64)1 << ((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) % 64) -#define vq_present(vqs, vq) ((vqs)[vq_word(vq)] & vq_mask(vq))
+#define vq_present(vqs, vq) (!!((vqs)[vq_word(vq)] & vq_mask(vq)))
static int get_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) {
--
1.8.3.1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@...ts.infradead.org> On
> Behalf Of Viresh Kumar
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 7:00 PM
> To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>; James Morse
> <james.morse@....com>; Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>; Suzuki K
> Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@....com>; Catalin Marinas
> <catalin.marinas@....com>; Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu; Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Subject: [PATCH V3] KVM: arm64: Implement vq_present() as a macro
>
> This routine is a one-liner and doesn't really need to be function and can be
> implemented as a macro.
>
> Suggested-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
> V2->V3:
> - Pass "vqs" instead of "&vqs" to vq_present().
> - Added Reviewed-by from Dave.
>
> V1->V2:
> - The previous implementation was fixing a compilation error that
> occurred only with old compilers (from 2015) due to a bug in the
> compiler itself.
>
> - Dave suggested to rather implement this as a macro which made more
> sense.
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 12 +++---------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c index
> 3ae2f82fca46..ae734fcfd4ea 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -207,13 +207,7 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const
> struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
>
> #define vq_word(vq) (((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) / 64) #define vq_mask(vq)
> ((u64)1 << ((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) % 64)
> -
> -static bool vq_present(
> - const u64 (*const vqs)[KVM_ARM64_SVE_VLS_WORDS],
> - unsigned int vq)
> -{
> - return (*vqs)[vq_word(vq)] & vq_mask(vq);
> -}
> +#define vq_present(vqs, vq) ((vqs)[vq_word(vq)] & vq_mask(vq))
>
> static int get_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
> { @@ -258,7 +252,7 @@ static int set_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const
> struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
>
> max_vq = 0;
> for (vq = SVE_VQ_MIN; vq <= SVE_VQ_MAX; ++vq)
> - if (vq_present(&vqs, vq))
> + if (vq_present(vqs, vq))
> max_vq = vq;
>
> if (max_vq > sve_vq_from_vl(kvm_sve_max_vl)) @@ -272,7 +266,7
> @@ static int set_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg
> *reg)
> * maximum:
> */
> for (vq = SVE_VQ_MIN; vq <= max_vq; ++vq)
> - if (vq_present(&vqs, vq) != sve_vq_available(vq))
> + if (vq_present(vqs, vq) != sve_vq_available(vq))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* Can't run with no vector lengths at all: */
> --
> 2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists