linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 07/18] kunit: test: add initial tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190702205712.GS19023@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 20:57:12 +0000
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        shuah <shuah@...nel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>,
        "Bird, Timothy" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
        Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, wfg@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/18] kunit: test: add initial tests

On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:52:50AM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:53 AM Brendan Higgins
> <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:22 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 01:26:02AM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/kunit/example-test.c b/kunit/example-test.c
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..f44b8ece488bb
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/kunit/example-test.c
> > >
> > > <-- snip -->
> > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * This defines a suite or grouping of tests.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Test cases are defined as belonging to the suite by adding them to
> > > > + * `kunit_cases`.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Often it is desirable to run some function which will set up things which
> > > > + * will be used by every test; this is accomplished with an `init` function
> > > > + * which runs before each test case is invoked. Similarly, an `exit` function
> > > > + * may be specified which runs after every test case and can be used to for
> > > > + * cleanup. For clarity, running tests in a test module would behave as follows:
> > > > + *
> > >
> > > To be clear this is not the kernel module init, but rather the kunit
> > > module init. I think using kmodule would make this clearer to a reader.
> >
> > Seems reasonable. Will fix in next revision.
> >
> > > > + * module.init(test);
> > > > + * module.test_case[0](test);
> > > > + * module.exit(test);
> > > > + * module.init(test);
> > > > + * module.test_case[1](test);
> > > > + * module.exit(test);
> > > > + * ...;
> > > > + */
> 
> Do you think it might be clearer yet to rename `struct kunit_module
> *module;` to `struct kunit_suite *suite;`?

Yes. Definitely. Or struct kunit_test. Up to you.

  Luis