[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190703154700.GI1729@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 08:47:00 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Seema Pandit <seema.pandit@...el.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Barror <robert.barror@...el.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filesystem-dax: Disable PMD support
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:11:19PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> BTW, looking into the xarray code, I think I found another difference
> between the old radix tree code and the new xarray code that could cause
> issues. In the old radix tree code if we tried to insert PMD entry but
> there was some PTE entry in the covered range, we'd get EEXIST error back
> and the DAX fault code relies on this. I don't see how similar behavior is
> achieved by xas_store()...
Are you referring to this?
- entry = dax_make_locked(0, size_flag | DAX_EMPTY);
-
- err = __radix_tree_insert(&mapping->i_pages, index,
- dax_entry_order(entry), entry);
- radix_tree_preload_end();
- if (err) {
- xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
- /*
- * Our insertion of a DAX entry failed, most likely
- * because we were inserting a PMD entry and it
- * collided with a PTE sized entry at a different
- * index in the PMD range. We haven't inserted
- * anything into the radix tree and have no waiters to
- * wake.
- */
- return ERR_PTR(err);
- }
If so, that can't happen any more because we no longer drop the i_pages
lock while the entry is NULL, so the entry is always locked while the
i_pages lock is dropped.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists