[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190704145631.58e78ce0add30b3987ea8845@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 14:56:31 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace/selftest: Test if set_event/ftrace_pid
exists before writing
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 22:01:05 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:51:26 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions
> > > > index 779ec11f61bd..a7b06291e32c 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions
> > > > @@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ initialize_ftrace() { # Reset ftrace to initial-state
> > > > reset_events_filter
> > > > reset_ftrace_filter
> > > > disable_events
> > > > - echo > set_event_pid # event tracer is always on
> > > > - echo > set_ftrace_pid
> > > > + [ -f set_event_pid ] && echo > set_event_pid # event tracer is always on
> > >
> > > I probably should remove that comment, because I believe that was why
> > > it wasn't tested :-/
> >
> > Hmm, OK. I think this comment means "the event tracer is always on if clearing
> > set_event_pid filter". Would this need to be removed?
>
> When this was added in commit 131f840d5b7 ("selftests: ftrace:
> Initialize ftrace before each test"), we had this:
>
> + echo > set_event_pid # event tracer is always on
> + [ -f set_ftrace_filter ] && echo | tee set_ftrace_*
> + [ -f set_graph_function ] && echo | tee set_graph_*
> + [ -f stack_trace_filter ] && echo > stack_trace_filter
> + [ -f kprobe_events ] && echo > kprobe_events
> + [ -f uprobe_events ] && echo > uprobe_events
>
> Where set_event_pid is the only file not tested for existence. I
> figured that comment was the reason for not testing it. If that was the
> case, then adding a test, I would think we should remove the comment.
Ah, I see.
>
> Do you agree?
Yes, I agree with removing it.
Thank you!
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > >
> > > -- Steve
> > >
> > >
> > > > + [ -f set_ftrace_pid ] && echo > set_ftrace_pid
> > > > [ -f set_ftrace_filter ] && echo | tee set_ftrace_*
> > > > [ -f set_graph_function ] && echo | tee set_graph_*
> > > > [ -f stack_trace_filter ] && echo > stack_trace_filter
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists