linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel.h: Update comment about simple

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXZzgbGoZvbAcQoe-h9_SNyppLm_Z0YZk4Jax6qhVZY3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jul 2019 09:14:50 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda Sandonis <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel.h: Update comment about simple_strto<foo>() functions

Hi Andy,

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:37 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:00:45PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:39 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> >
> > > @@ -437,7 +435,15 @@ static inline int __must_check kstrtos32_from_user(const char __user *s, size_t
> > >         return kstrtoint_from_user(s, count, base, res);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -/* Obsolete, do not use.  Use kstrto<foo> instead */
> > > +/*
> > > + * Use kstrto<foo> instead.
> > > + *
> > > + * NOTE: The simple_strto<foo> does not check for overflow and,
> > > + *      depending on the input, may give interesting results.
> > > + *
> > > + * Use these functions if and only if the code will need in place
> > > + * conversion and otherwise looks very ugly. Keep in mind above caveat.
> >
> > What do you mean by "in place conversion"?
> > The input buffer is const, and not modified by the callee.
> > Do you mean that these functions do not require NUL termination (just
> > after the number), and the characters making up the number don't have to
> > be copied to a separate buffer to make them NUL-terminated?
>
> The second one, could you propose better wording for that?

What about:

"Use these functions if and only if you cannot use kstrto<foo>, because
 the number is not immediately followed by a NUL-character in the buffer.
 Keep in mind above caveat."

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds