linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] perf: Fix errors detected by Smatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190704072958.GA26160@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jul 2019 15:29:58 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>,
        Eric Saint-Etienne <eric.saint.etienne@...cle.com>,
        Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] perf: Fix errors detected by Smatch

Hi Arnaldo,

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 03:18:15PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:48:08AM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 06:34:09PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > > When I used static checker Smatch for perf building, the main target is
> > > > to check if there have any potential issues in Arm cs-etm code.  So
> > > > finally I get many reporting for errors/warnings.
> > > > 
> > > > I used below command for using static checker with perf building:
> > > > 
> > > >   # make VF=1 CORESIGHT=1 -C tools/perf/ \
> > > >     CHECK="/root/Work/smatch/smatch --full-path" \
> > > >     CC=/root/Work/smatch/cgcc | tee smatch_reports.txt
> > > > 
> > > > I reviewed the errors one by one, if I understood some of these errors
> > > > so changed the code as I can, this patch set is the working result; but
> > > > still leave some errors due to I don't know what's the best way to fix
> > > > it.  There also have many inconsistent indenting warnings.  So I firstly
> > > > send out this patch set and let's see what's the feedback from public
> > > > reviewing.
> > > > 
> > > > Leo Yan (11):
> > > >   perf report: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > > >   perf stat: Smatch: Fix use-after-freed pointer
> > > >   perf top: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > > >   perf annotate: Smatch: Fix dereferencing freed memory
> > > >   perf trace: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > > >   perf hists: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > > >   perf map: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > > >   perf session: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > > >   perf intel-bts: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > > >   perf intel-pt: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > > >   perf cs-etm: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > > 
> > > from quick look it all looks good to me, nice tool ;-)
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > 
> > Thanks for reviewing, Jiri.
> > 
> > @Arnaldo, Just want to check, will you firstly pick up 01~05, 07,
> > 08/11 patches if you think they are okay?  Or you want to wait me to
> > spin new patch set with all patches after I gather all comments?
> 
> I'm picking up the uncontrovertial, will push to my perf/core branch,
> continue from there, please.

Will do it.  Thank you much for amendment in these patches.

Leo.