[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190704082001.GD6546@8bytes.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:20:01 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
aarch64-laptops@...ts.linaro.org,
Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu: add support for drivers that manage iommu
explicitly
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 01:26:18PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> 1) In some cases the bootloader takes the iommu out of bypass and
> enables the display. This is in particular a problem on the aarch64
> laptops that exist these days, and modern snapdragon android devices.
> (Older devices also enabled the display in bootloader but did not
> take the iommu out of bypass.) Attaching a DMA or IDENTITY domain
> while scanout is active, before the driver has a chance to intervene,
> makes things go *boom*
Just to make sure I get this right: The bootloader inializes the SMMU
and creates non-identity mappings for the GPU? And when the SMMU driver
in Linux takes over this breaks display output.
> + /*
> + * If driver is going to manage iommu directly, then avoid
> + * attaching any non driver managed domain. There could
> + * be already active dma underway (ie. scanout in case of
> + * bootloader enabled display), and interfering with that
> + * will make things go *boom*
> + */
> + if ((domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED) &&
> + dev->driver && dev->driver->driver_manages_iommu)
> + return 0;
> +
When the default domain is attached, there is usually no driver attached
yet. I think this needs to be communicated by the firmware to Linux and
the code should check against that.
> - bool suppress_bind_attrs; /* disables bind/unbind via sysfs */
> + bool suppress_bind_attrs:1; /* disables bind/unbind via sysfs */
> + bool driver_manages_iommu:1; /* driver manages IOMMU explicitly */
How does this field get set?
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists