[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b920d85b-4228-52fd-22db-3a0c26cf8ebd@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 14:05:22 +0200
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] sched/dl: Capacity-aware migrations
On 5/6/19 6:48 AM, Luca Abeni wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 5b981eeeb944..3436f3d8fa8f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1584,6 +1584,9 @@ select_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
> if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE)
> goto out;
>
> + if (dl_entity_is_special(&p->dl))
> + goto out;
I wonder if this is really required. The if condition
1591 if (unlikely(dl_task(curr)) &&
1592 (curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
1593 !dl_entity_preempt(&p->dl, &curr->dl)) &&
1594 (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)) {
further below uses '!dl_entity_preempt(&p->dl, &curr->dl))' which
returns 'dl_entity_is_special(a) || ...'
A BUG_ON(dl_entity_is_special(&p->dl)) in this if condition hasn't
triggered on my platform yet.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists