linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] pinctrl: aspeed: Preparation for AST2600

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <022b6528-7ab3-449f-807d-d711b6d2db51@www.fastmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 04 Jul 2019 10:28:45 +1000
From:   "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@...id.au>
To:     "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Ryan Chen" <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Joel Stanley" <joel@....id.au>, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        "OpenBMC Maillist" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] pinctrl: aspeed: Preparation for AST2600



On Wed, 3 Jul 2019, at 18:40, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 4:39 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > The ASPEED AST2600 is in the pipeline, and we have enough information to start
> > preparing to upstream support for it. This series lays some ground work;
> > splitting the bindings and dicing the implementation up a little further to
> > facilitate differences between the 2600 and previous SoC generations.
> >
> > v2 addresses Rob's comments on the bindings conversion patches. v1 can be found
> > here:
> 
> I have applied this series, I had to strip some changes of the header
> because it was based on some SPDX cleanups upstream but no
> big deal I think. Check the result please.

Thanks. Have you pushed the branch yet? I just fetched your pinctrl tree
and can't see the patches.

Andrew