[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4456003dfa654444b8af7b7be9a9c30e@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 15:39:41 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior' <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/7] Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> Sent: 04 July 2019 16:38
>
> Just a small series to clean up various "struct spinlock" user and make
> them use "spinlock_t" instead.
I thought it was policy to avoid typedefs?
Probably because you can only define them once.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists