linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] genirq: update irq stats from NMI handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47489142-b040-ec54-a1ac-46f0a8799ed9@marvell.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jul 2019 16:31:34 +0000
From:   Shijith Thotton <sthotton@...vell.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        "Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair" <jnair@...vell.com>,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...vell.com>,
        Jan Glauber <jglauber@...vell.com>,
        Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: update irq stats from NMI handlers



On 7/4/19 9:19 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019, Shijith Thotton wrote:
>> On 7/4/19 12:13 AM, Julien Thierry wrote:
>>> Looking at handle_percpu_irq(), I think this might be acceptable. But
>>> does it make sense to only have kstats for percpu NMIs?
>>>
>>
>> It would be better to have stats for both.
>>
>> handle_fasteoi_nmi() can use __kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu() if below
>> change can be added to kstat_irqs_cpu().
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
>> index a92b33593b8d..9484e88dabc2 100644
>> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
>> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
>> @@ -950,6 +950,11 @@ unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
>>                           *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, cpu) : 0;
>>    }
>>
>> +static bool irq_is_nmi(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> +{
>> +       return desc->istate & IRQS_NMI;
>> +}
>> +
>>    /**
>>     * kstat_irqs - Get the statistics for an interrupt
>>     * @irq:       The interrupt number
>> @@ -967,7 +972,8 @@ unsigned int kstat_irqs(unsigned int irq)
>>           if (!desc || !desc->kstat_irqs)
>>                   return 0;
>>           if (!irq_settings_is_per_cpu_devid(desc) &&
>> -           !irq_settings_is_per_cpu(desc))
>> +           !irq_settings_is_per_cpu(desc) &&
>> +           !irq_is_nmi(desc))
>>               return desc->tot_count;
>>
>>           for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
>>
>>
>> Thomas,
>> Please suggest a better way if any.
> 
> Looks good.
> 

Thanks Thomas. Will share v2 with the changes.

Thanks,
Shijith