linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190704141358.495791a385f7dd762cb749c2@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jul 2019 14:13:58 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "anshuman.khandual@....com" <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support

On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 21:54:36 +0100 Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:

> >> mm-clean-up-is_device__page-definitions.patch
> >> mm-introduce-arch_has_pte_devmap.patch
> >> arm64-mm-implement-pte_devmap-support.patch
> >> arm64-mm-implement-pte_devmap-support-fix.patch
> > 
> > This one we discussed, and I thought we agreed would go to your 'stage
> > after linux-next' flow (see above). I think the conflict was minor
> > here.
> 
> I can rebase and resend tomorrow if there's an agreement on what exactly 
> to base it on - I'd really like to get this ticked off for 5.3 if at all 
> possible.

I took another look.  Yes, it looks like the repairs were simple.

Let me now try to compile all this...