| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190705085541.9356-5-raphael.gault@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 09:55:40 +0100
From: Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: perf: Enable pmu counter direct access for perf event on armv8
Keep track of event opened with direct access to the hardware counters
and modify permissions while they are open.
The strategy used here is the same which x86 uses: everytime an event
is mapped, the permissions are set if required. The atomic field added
in the mm_context helps keep track of the different event opened and
de-activate the permissions when all are unmapped.
We also need to update the permissions in the context switch code so
that tasks keep the right permissions.
Signed-off-by: Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@....com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h | 6 +++++
arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 2 ++
arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h | 14 ++++++++++
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h
index fd6161336653..88ed4466bd06 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h
@@ -18,6 +18,12 @@
typedef struct {
atomic64_t id;
+
+ /*
+ * non-zero if userspace have access to hardware
+ * counters directly.
+ */
+ atomic_t pmu_direct_access;
void *vdso;
unsigned long flags;
} mm_context_t;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index 7ed0adb187a8..6e66ff940494 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <asm-generic/mm_hooks.h>
#include <asm/cputype.h>
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
+#include <asm/perf_event.h>
#include <asm/sysreg.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -224,6 +225,7 @@ static inline void __switch_mm(struct mm_struct *next)
}
check_and_switch_context(next, cpu);
+ perf_switch_user_access(next);
}
static inline void
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 2bdbc79bbd01..ba58fa726631 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <asm/stack_pointer.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/mm_types.h>
#define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS 32
#define ARMV8_PMU_COUNTER_MASK (ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
@@ -223,4 +224,17 @@ extern unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
(regs)->pstate = PSR_MODE_EL1h; \
}
+static inline void perf_switch_user_access(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS))
+ return;
+
+ if (atomic_read(&mm->context.pmu_direct_access)) {
+ write_sysreg(ARMV8_PMU_USERENR_ER|ARMV8_PMU_USERENR_CR,
+ pmuserenr_el0);
+ } else {
+ write_sysreg(0, pmuserenr_el0);
+ }
+}
+
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 2d06b8095a19..4844fe97d775 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include <linux/irqdesc.h>
#include <asm/irq_regs.h>
+#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct arm_pmu *, cpu_armpmu);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_irq);
@@ -778,6 +779,41 @@ static void cpu_pmu_destroy(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
&cpu_pmu->node);
}
+static void refresh_pmuserenr(void *mm)
+{
+ perf_switch_user_access(mm);
+}
+
+static void armpmu_event_mapped(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ if (!(event->hw.flags & ARMPMU_EL0_RD_CNTR))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * This function relies on not being called concurrently in two
+ * tasks in the same mm. Otherwise one task could observe
+ * pmu_direct_access > 1 and return all the way back to
+ * userspace with user access disabled while another task is still
+ * doing on_each_cpu_mask() to enable user access.
+ *
+ * For now, this can't happen because all callers hold mmap_sem
+ * for write. If this changes, we'll need a different solution.
+ */
+ lockdep_assert_held_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&mm->context.pmu_direct_access) == 1)
+ on_each_cpu(refresh_pmuserenr, mm, 1);
+}
+
+static void armpmu_event_unmapped(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ if (!(event->hw.flags & ARMPMU_EL0_RD_CNTR))
+ return;
+
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->context.pmu_direct_access))
+ on_each_cpu_mask(mm_cpumask(mm), refresh_pmuserenr, NULL, 1);
+}
+
static struct arm_pmu *__armpmu_alloc(gfp_t flags)
{
struct arm_pmu *pmu;
@@ -799,6 +835,8 @@ static struct arm_pmu *__armpmu_alloc(gfp_t flags)
.pmu_enable = armpmu_enable,
.pmu_disable = armpmu_disable,
.event_init = armpmu_event_init,
+ .event_mapped = armpmu_event_mapped,
+ .event_unmapped = armpmu_event_unmapped,
.add = armpmu_add,
.del = armpmu_del,
.start = armpmu_start,
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists