linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: PM: Unexport acpi_device_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2054223.OgheZKOciF@kreacher>
Date:   Fri, 05 Jul 2019 11:46:52 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: PM: Unexport acpi_device_get_power()

On Thursday, July 4, 2019 9:46:40 AM CEST Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 01:02:49AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > 
> > Using acpi_device_get_power() outside of ACPI device initialization
> > and ACPI sysfs is problematic due to the way in which power resources
> > are handled by it, so unexport it and add a paragraph explaining the
> > pitfalls to its kerneldoc comment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > ---
> 
> Makes perfect sense!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> 

Thanks!

I've queued this one for 5.3.