[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190705095008.GB17491@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 10:50:08 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: Fix support for GPIO based PERST#
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 09:48:50AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Commit 5e5e9c23f82a ("PCI: tegra: Add support for GPIO based PERST#")
> calls the function devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node() to request a GPIO.
> Unfortunately, around the same time this was merged, commit 025bf37725f1
> ("gpio: Fix return value mismatch of function gpiod_get_from_of_node()")
> was also merged to fix the return value of the function
> devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node() that was incorrectly returning NULL
> instead of an error pointer encoded with -ENOENT if no GPIO was found.
> When this fix for the GPIO subsystem was merged, PCI support for Tegra
> devices that did not provide a GPIO for the PERST# (which is optional)
> broke because the Tegra PCI driver was expecting NULL to be returned if
> no GPIO was present and not -ENOENT.
>
> Fix this by checking to see if -ENOENT is returned from the function
> devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(), to indicate there is no GPIO for PERST#
> present, and if this is the case set the variable 'reset_gpio' to NULL.
> If the variable 'reset_gpio' is NULL then the Tegra PCI driver will
> fallback to using the AFI register to toggle the PERST#. Finally,
> correct the comment now that NULL is no longer returned from
> devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node().
>
> Fixes: 5e5e9c23f82a ("PCI: tegra: Add support for GPIO based PERST#")
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Can I squash this in the original commit (ie Fixes: tag above) ? I do
not think there is any issue with that, if there is please do let me
know.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> index 9cc03a2549c0..ff8a346f3e04 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> @@ -2295,18 +2295,22 @@ static int tegra_pcie_parse_dt(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Returns null if reset-gpios property is not populated and
> - * fall back to using AFI per port register to toggle PERST#
> - * SFIO line.
> + * Returns -ENOENT if reset-gpios property is not populated
> + * and in this case fall back to using AFI per port register
> + * to toggle PERST# SFIO line.
> */
> rp->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(dev, port,
> "reset-gpios", 0,
> GPIOD_OUT_LOW,
> label);
> if (IS_ERR(rp->reset_gpio)) {
> - err = PTR_ERR(rp->reset_gpio);
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset GPIO: %d\n", err);
> - return err;
> + if (PTR_ERR(rp->reset_gpio) == -ENOENT) {
> + rp->reset_gpio = NULL;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset GPIO: %d\n",
> + err);
> + return PTR_ERR(rp->reset_gpio);
> + }
> }
>
> list_add_tail(&rp->list, &pcie->ports);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists