linux-kernel - Re: linux-next boot error: WARNING in corrupted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190705105442.kpvvyxakpa6mrxlu@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jul 2019 16:24:42 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+de771ae9390dffed7266@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next boot error: WARNING in corrupted

On 05-07-19, 16:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This fixes it for me (after faking the failure). @Rafael this needs to
> be merged to the top commit:
> 
> 0d4c2a013b32 cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints

@Rafael: I have sent V7 of this patch now after merging below diff
(and improving it further). Thanks.

> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 13c2f119cc0c..5eecd54195a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1228,12 +1228,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
>                 goto err_min_qos_notifier;
>         }
>  
> -       policy->min_freq_req = kzalloc(2 * sizeof(*policy->min_freq_req),
> -                                      GFP_KERNEL);
> -       if (!policy->min_freq_req)
> -               goto err_max_qos_notifier;
> -
> -       policy->max_freq_req = policy->min_freq_req + 1;
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&policy->policy_list);
>         init_rwsem(&policy->rwsem);
>         spin_lock_init(&policy->transition_lock);
> @@ -1244,9 +1238,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
>         policy->cpu = cpu;
>         return policy;
>  
> -err_max_qos_notifier:
> -       dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(dev, &policy->nb_max,
> -                                  DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY);
>  err_min_qos_notifier:
>         dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(dev, &policy->nb_min,
>                                    DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY);
> @@ -1370,6 +1361,13 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
>                         add_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, j);
>                 }
>  
> +               policy->min_freq_req = kzalloc(2 * sizeof(*policy->min_freq_req),
> +                                              GFP_KERNEL);
> +               if (!policy->min_freq_req)
> +                       goto out_destroy_policy;
> +
> +               policy->max_freq_req = policy->min_freq_req + 1;
> +
>                 ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, policy->min_freq_req,
>                                              DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY,
>                                              policy->min);

-- 
viresh