linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190705125044.12c10552@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jul 2019 12:50:44 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Trigger Huang <Trigger.Huang@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-fixes tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c

between commit:

  25f09f858835 ("drm/amdgpu/gfx9: use reset default for PA_SC_FIFO_SIZE")

from the drm-fixes tree and commit:

  1bff7f6c679f ("drm/amdgpu: RLC to program regs for Vega10 SR-IOV")

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (the former removes the code modified by the latter) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped