[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <trinity-7b1977bd-252b-4482-b708-cf704a9d3da1-1562340946396@3c-app-gmx-bs68>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 17:35:46 +0200
From: "Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"Sean Wang" <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
"Sebastian Reichel" <sre@...nel.org>,
"Alessandro Zummo" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
"Eddie Huang" <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Richard Fontana" <rfontana@...hat.com>,
"Allison Randal" <allison@...utok.net>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Josef Friedl" <josef.friedl@...ed.at>
Subject: Aw: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] rtc: mt6397: improvements of rtc driver
Hi Alexander,
thank you for the Review
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 04. Juli 2019 um 22:43 Uhr
> Von: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> > - rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_allocate_device(rtc->dev);
> > - if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev))
> > - return PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev);
> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, rtc->irq, NULL,
> > + mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread,
> > + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> > + "mt6397-rtc", rtc);
> >
>
> This change may lead to a crash and the allocation was intentionally
> placed before the irq request.
i got no crash till now, but i will try to move the allocation before irq-request
> > - ret = request_threaded_irq(rtc->irq, NULL,
> > - mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread,
> > - IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> > - "mt6397-rtc", rtc);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request alarm IRQ: %d: %d\n",
> > rtc->irq, ret);
> > @@ -287,6 +281,10 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
> >
> > + rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
> > + if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev))
> > + return PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev);
> > +
> > rtc->rtc_dev->ops = &mtk_rtc_ops;
> > static const struct of_device_id mt6397_rtc_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6323-rtc", },
>
> Unrelated change, this is not an improvement and must be accompanied by
> a documentation change.
documentation is changed in 1/7 defining this compatible. i called it improvement because existing driver now supports another chip
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists