linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: net: Add bindings for Realtek PHYs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Jul 2019 10:18:24 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: net: Add bindings for Realtek PHYs

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:08 PM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 11:33:27PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > I think if we're going to have custom properties for phys, we should
> > > have a compatible string to at least validate whether the custom
> > > properties are even valid for the node.
> >
> > Hi Rob
> >
> > What happens with other enumerable busses where a compatible string is
> > not used?
> >
> > The Ethernet PHY subsystem will ignore the compatible string and load
> > the driver which fits the enumeration data. Using the compatible
> > string only to get the right YAML validator seems wrong. I would
> > prefer adding some other property with a clear name indicates its is
> > selecting the validator, and has nothing to do with loading the
> > correct driver. And it can then be used as well for USB and PCI
> > devices etc.
>
> I also have doubts whether a compatible string is the right answer
> here. It's not needed/used by the subsystem, but would it be a
> required property because it's needed for validation?

It could be required only for phy's with vendor specific properties.