[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1907051504310.1606-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 15:10:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Ryan Kennedy <ryan5544@...il.com>
cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: pci-quirks: Minor cleanup for AMD PLL quirk
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019, Ryan Kennedy wrote:
> usb_amd_find_chipset_info() is used for chipset detection for
> several quirks. It is strange that its return value indicates
> the need for the PLL quirk, which means it is often ignored.
> This patch adds a function specifically for checking the PLL
> quirk like the other ones. Additionally, rename probe_result to
> something more appropriate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Kennedy <ryan5544@...il.com>
> @@ -322,6 +317,13 @@ bool usb_amd_prefetch_quirk(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_amd_prefetch_quirk);
>
> +bool usb_amd_quirk_pll_check(void)
> +{
> + usb_amd_find_chipset_info();
> + return amd_chipset.need_pll_quirk;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_amd_quirk_pll_check);
I really don't see the point of separating out all but one line into a
different function. You might as well just rename
usb_amd_find_chipset_info to usb_amd_quirk_pll_check (along with the
other code adjustments) and be done with it.
However, in the end I don't care if you still want to do this. Either
way:
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists