[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190708175533.GA14138@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:55:33 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] watchdog: ie6xx_wdt: Use spinlock_t instead of
struct spinlock
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 05:38:01PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> For spinlocks the type spinlock_t should be used instead of "struct
> spinlock".
>
> Use spinlock_t for spinlock's definition.
>
> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/ie6xx_wdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/ie6xx_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/ie6xx_wdt.c
> index 508fbefce9f6a..82a8cf61efc2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/ie6xx_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/ie6xx_wdt.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(resetmode,
>
> static struct {
> unsigned short sch_wdtba;
> - struct spinlock unlock_sequence;
> + spinlock_t unlock_sequence;
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> struct dentry *debugfs;
> #endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists