linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the pidfd tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:12:36 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the
 pidfd tree

Hi all,

On Wed, 22 May 2019 11:43:14 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   kernel/pid.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   99e9da7f2796 ("pid: add pidfd_open()")
> 
> from the pidfd tree and commit:
> 
>   51c59c914840 ("kernel/pid.c: convert struct pid:count to refcount_t")
> 
> from the akpm-current tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc kernel/pid.c
> index 39181ccca846,b59681973dd6..000000000000
> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@@ -37,8 -36,7 +37,8 @@@
>   #include <linux/init_task.h>
>   #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>   #include <linux/proc_ns.h>
> - #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> + #include <linux/refcount.h>
>  +#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
>   #include <linux/sched/task.h>
>   #include <linux/idr.h>
>   

I am still getting this conflict.  Just a reminder in case you think
Linus may need to know.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped