[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190709095321.79175dfe@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:53:21 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvms390 tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 15:43:15 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvms390 tree got a conflict in:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
>
> between commit:
>
> 61cfcd545e42 ("kvm: tests: Sort tests in the Makefile alphabetically")
>
> from Linus' tree and commits:
>
> ee1563f42856 ("KVM: selftests: Add the sync_regs test for s390x")
> 49fe9a5d1638 ("KVM: selftests: Move kvm_create_max_vcpus test to generic code")
>
> from the kvms390 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> index 62afd0b43074,0d7265da1583..000000000000
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> @@@ -10,25 -10,29 +10,30 @@@ UNAME_M := $(shell uname -m
> LIBKVM = lib/assert.c lib/elf.c lib/io.c lib/kvm_util.c lib/ucall.c lib/sparsebit.c
> LIBKVM_x86_64 = lib/x86_64/processor.c lib/x86_64/vmx.c
> LIBKVM_aarch64 = lib/aarch64/processor.c
> + LIBKVM_s390x = lib/s390x/processor.c
>
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 = x86_64/platform_info_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/set_sregs_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/sync_regs_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/state_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 = x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/evmcs_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/hyperv_cpuid
> - TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/kvm_create_max_vcpus
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_close_while_nested_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/mmio_warning_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/platform_info_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/set_sregs_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/smm_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/state_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/sync_regs_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_close_while_nested_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += dirty_log_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += clear_dirty_log_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += dirty_log_test
> ++TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
>
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += clear_dirty_log_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
> + TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
> +
> + TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/sync_regs_test
> + TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += kvm_create_max_vcpus
>
> TEST_GEN_PROGS += $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_$(UNAME_M))
> LIBKVM += $(LIBKVM_$(UNAME_M))
I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists