linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the pci tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:55:27 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@...el.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the pci
 tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:53:52 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 13:20:27 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   151f4e2bdc7a ("docs: power: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst")
> > 
> > from the pci tree and commit:
> > 
> >   1bf676cc2dba ("drm/i915: move and rename i915_runtime_pm")
> > 
> > from the drm-intel tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (I just removed the struct definition from this files as
> > the latter did - its comment will need to be fixed up in its new file)
> > and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> > is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.  
> 
> This is now a conflict between the drm and pci trees.

I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped