[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190709095833.727ac5e8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:58:33 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the pci tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:47:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/index.rst
>
> between commit:
>
> c42eaffa1656 ("Documentation: add Linux PCI to Sphinx TOC tree")
>
> from the pci tree and commit:
>
> ecefae6db042 ("docs: usb: rename files to .rst and add them to drivers-api")
>
> from the usb tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc Documentation/index.rst
> index 239100accbf6,91055adde327..000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/index.rst
> @@@ -101,7 -101,7 +101,8 @@@ needed)
> filesystems/index
> vm/index
> bpf/index
> + PCI/index
> + usb/index
> misc-devices/index
>
> Architecture-specific documentation
I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists