linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 04/25] arm64: Substitute gettimeofday with C implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b10b6723-6d5f-e667-b626-f13f5a5c3400@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jul 2019 14:09:07 +0100
From:   Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
To:     Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Huw Davies <huw@...eweavers.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Shijith Thotton <sthotton@...vell.com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/25] arm64: Substitute gettimeofday with C
 implementation

Hi Sylwester,

On 08/07/2019 13:57, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi Vincenzo, 
> 
> On 6/29/19 08:58, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
>> If I may, I would like to ask to you one favor, could you please keep an eye on
>> next and once those patches are merged repeat the test?
>>
>> I want just to make sure that the regression does not reappear.
> 
> My apologies, I forgot about this for a moment. I repeated the test with 
> next-20190705 tag and couldn't see any regressions.
> 

No problem and thank you for the confirmation.

-- 
Regards,
Vincenzo