lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon,  8 Jul 2019 17:12:19 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
        Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 026/102] btrfs: start readahead also in seed devices

From: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>

commit c4e0540d0ad49c8ceab06cceed1de27c4fe29f6e upstream.

Currently, btrfs does not consult seed devices to start readahead. As a
result, if readahead zone is added to the seed devices, btrfs_reada_wait()
indefinitely wait for the reada_ctl to finish.

You can reproduce the hung by modifying btrfs/163 to have larger initial
file size (e.g. xfs_io pwrite 4M instead of current 256K).

Fixes: 7414a03fbf9e ("btrfs: initial readahead code and prototypes")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 3.2+: ce7791ffee1e: Btrfs: fix race between readahead and device replace/removal
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 3.2+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/reada.c |    5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/btrfs/reada.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/reada.c
@@ -759,6 +759,7 @@ static void __reada_start_machine(struct
 	u64 total = 0;
 	int i;
 
+again:
 	do {
 		enqueued = 0;
 		mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
@@ -771,6 +772,10 @@ static void __reada_start_machine(struct
 		mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
 		total += enqueued;
 	} while (enqueued && total < 10000);
+	if (fs_devices->seed) {
+		fs_devices = fs_devices->seed;
+		goto again;
+	}
 
 	if (enqueued == 0)
 		return;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists