linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190708040931.GJ2911@vkoul-mobl>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:39:31 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Angelo Dureghello <angelo@...am.it>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree

On 08-07-19, 02:01, Robin Gong wrote:
> On 06-07-19, 22:43, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > 	That's caused by 'of_irq_count' NOT export to global symbol, and I'm
> > > curious why it has been here for so long since Zhangfei found it in
> > > 2015.
> > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatc
> > >
> > hwork.kernel.org%2Fpatch%2F7404681%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyibin.gon
> > g%40
> > >
> > nxp.com%7C6172242dfadd4f71c09a08d70220bf6f%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92
> > cd99c5
> > >
> > c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636980211986259586&amp;sdata=L8v%2B1o5zfgIAS
> > go4qr3pu
> > > cQ%2Byox1irANsvRv5ZNLlLM%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > 
> > Yes this does not seem to be applied, perhaps Rob can explain why. But this was
> > not exported how did you test it?
> I had no such issue because I built in fsl-edma instead of Stephen's config with building module.

But you support it as a module, right? I am inclined to revert the patch
now!

-- 
~Vinod