linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the hwmon-staging tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190709101754.1836ac73@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:17:54 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabian Schindlatz <fabian.schindlatz@....de>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the hwmon-staging
 tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 17:15:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   601fdf7e6635 ("hwmon: Correct struct allocation style")
> 
> from the hwmon-staging tree and commit:
> 
>   835896a59b95 ("hwmon/coretemp: Cosmetic: Rename internal variables to zones from packages")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the comment fixed in the latter was also fixed in the
> former) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
> to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
> You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
> conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped