[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5864549-40c3-badd-8c41-d5b7bf3c4f3c@c-s.fr>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 07:04:43 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: slightly improve cache helpers
Le 08/07/2019 à 21:14, Nathan Chancellor a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:19:30AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 09:24:48 UTC, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>> Cache instructions (dcbz, dcbi, dcbf and dcbst) take two registers
>>> that are summed to obtain the target address. Using 'Z' constraint
>>> and '%y0' argument gives GCC the opportunity to use both registers
>>> instead of only one with the second being forced to 0.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
>>
>> Applied to powerpc next, thanks.
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/6c5875843b87c3adea2beade9d1b8b3d4523900a
>>
>> cheers
>
> This patch causes a regression with clang:
Is that a Clang bug ?
Do you have a disassembly of the code both with and without this patch
in order to compare ?
Segher, any idea ?
Christophe
>
> https://travis-ci.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/213944668
>
> I've attached my local bisect/build log.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists