linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] f2fs: improve print log in f2fs_sanity_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 13:11:09 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Park Ju Hyung <qkrwngud825@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: improve print log in f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt()

On 2019-7-9 7:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 07/08, Chao Yu wrote:
>> As Park Ju Hyung suggested:
>>
>> "I'd like to suggest to write down an actual version of f2fs-tools
>> here as we've seen older versions of fsck doing even more damage
>> and the users might not have the latest f2fs-tools installed."
>>
>> This patch give a more detailed info of how we fix such corruption
>> to user to avoid damageable repair with low version fsck.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Park Ju Hyung <qkrwngud825@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/f2fs/super.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> index 019422a0844c..3cd6c8d810f9 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> @@ -2737,7 +2737,8 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>  
>>  	if (__is_set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_LARGE_NAT_BITMAP_FLAG) &&
>>  		le32_to_cpu(ckpt->checksum_offset) != CP_MIN_CHKSUM_OFFSET) {
>> -		f2fs_warn(sbi, "layout of large_nat_bitmap is deprecated, run fsck to repair, chksum_offset: %u",
>> +		f2fs_warn(sbi, "using deprecated layout of large_nat_bitmap, "
>> +			  "please run fsck v1.13.0 or higher to repair, chksum_offset: %u",
> 
> How about adding the patch name as well?

For end-user, I think they don't care about commit id or patch title...

But anyway, let me send v2 as you suggested, either one is okay to me.

Thanks,

> 
>>  			  le32_to_cpu(ckpt->checksum_offset));
>>  		return 1;
>>  	}
>> -- 
>> 2.18.0.rc1