lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:25:17 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k
 tree

Hi all,

On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 09:09:12 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/m68k/Kconfig
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   34dc63a5fb9b ("m68k: Use the generic dma coherent remap allocator")
>   69878ef47562 ("m68k: Implement arch_dma_prep_coherent()")
> 
> from the m68k tree and commit:
> 
>   bdd15a288492 ("binfmt_flat: replace flat_argvp_envp_on_stack with a Kconfig variable")
>   aef0f78e7460 ("binfmt_flat: add a ARCH_HAS_BINFMT_FLAT option")
> 
> from the m68knommu tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc arch/m68k/Kconfig
> index 00f5c98a5e05,c0c43c624afa..000000000000
> --- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig
> @@@ -3,13 -3,12 +3,15 @@@ config M68
>   	bool
>   	default y
>   	select ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T
> + 	select ARCH_HAS_BINFMT_FLAT
>  +	select ARCH_HAS_DMA_MMAP_PGPROT if MMU && !COLDFIRE
>  +	select ARCH_HAS_DMA_PREP_COHERENT
>   	select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE if HAS_DMA
>   	select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT if ISA
>   	select ARCH_NO_COHERENT_DMA_MMAP if !MMU
>   	select ARCH_NO_PREEMPT if !COLDFIRE
> + 	select BINFMT_FLAT_ARGVP_ENVP_ON_STACK
>  +	select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP if HAS_DMA && MMU && !COLDFIRE
>   	select HAVE_IDE
>   	select HAVE_AOUT if MMU
>   	select HAVE_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE

I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

This is now a conflict between the m68knommu tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ