[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190709165459.11b353d8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 16:54:59 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/block/rbd.c: In function 'wake_lock_waiters':
drivers/block/rbd.c:3933:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_assert_held_exclusive'; did you mean 'lockdep_assert_held_write'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lockdep_assert_held_write
Caused by commit
9ffbe8ac05db ("locking/lockdep: Rename lockdep_assert_held_exclusive() -> lockdep_assert_held_write()")
interacting with commits
637cd060537d ("rbd: new exclusive lock wait/wake code")
a2b1da09793d ("rbd: lock should be quiesced on reacquire")
from the ceph tree.
I have added the following merge fix patch for today.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 16:46:12 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] rbd: fix up for lockdep_assert_held_exclusive rename
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/block/rbd.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index 723c3ef4bd59..02216fbdb854 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -3930,7 +3930,7 @@ static void wake_lock_waiters(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, int result)
struct rbd_img_request *img_req;
dout("%s rbd_dev %p result %d\n", __func__, rbd_dev, result);
- lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem);
+ lockdep_assert_held_write(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem);
cancel_delayed_work(&rbd_dev->lock_dwork);
if (!completion_done(&rbd_dev->acquire_wait)) {
@@ -4209,7 +4209,7 @@ static bool rbd_quiesce_lock(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
bool need_wait;
dout("%s rbd_dev %p\n", __func__, rbd_dev);
- lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem);
+ lockdep_assert_held_write(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem);
if (rbd_dev->lock_state != RBD_LOCK_STATE_LOCKED)
return false;
--
2.20.1
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists