[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190709075119.rg6ktsg7nwdadsmd@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 13:21:19 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Anson.Huang@....com
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
vireshk@...nel.org, nm@...com, sboyd@...nel.org,
leonard.crestez@....com, aisheng.dong@....com,
daniel.baluta@....com, ping.bai@....com, l.stach@...gutronix.de,
abel.vesa@....com, ccaione@...libre.com, angus@...ea.ca,
andrew.smirnov@...il.com, agx@...xcpu.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] opp: of: Support multiple suspend OPPs defined in DT
On 09-07-19, 15:10, Anson.Huang@....com wrote:
> From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
>
> With property "opp-supported-hw" introduced, the OPP table
> in DT could be a large OPP table and ONLY a subset of OPPs
> are available, based on the version of the hardware running
> on. That introduces restriction of using "opp-suspend"
> property to define the suspend OPP, as we are NOT sure if the
> OPP containing "opp-suspend" property is available for the
> hardware running on, and the of opp core does NOT allow multiple
> suspend OPPs defined in DT OPP table.
>
> To eliminate this restrition, make of opp core allow multiple
> suspend OPPs defined in DT, and pick the OPP with highest rate
> and with "opp-suspend" property present to be suspend OPP, it
> can speed up the suspend/resume process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> ---
> drivers/opp/of.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Please update the DT bindings first.
FWIW, all three patches look fine otherwise.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists