linux-kernel - Re: Coccinelle: Handling of SmPL disjunctions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f6bf9e46-26a6-2627-40a3-1f7eca61b84b@web.de>
Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:52:53 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@....com.cn>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Ma Jiang <ma.jiang@....com.cn>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
        Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: Handling of SmPL disjunctions

>>> How do you think about to increase the matching granularity
>>> for this functionality?
>>
>> No idea what this means.  Disjunctions are expanded up to the level of the
>> nodes in the control-flow graph.
>
> We have got different expectations for working with such nodes
> for possible (data flow) analysis.

Will the chances become better to clarify this functionality?

Which software components are involved so far?

Regards,
Markus