lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190709100741.1ad8ed91@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:07:41 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the fbdev tree with the v4l-dvb
 tree

Hi all,

On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:28:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the fbdev tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtvfb.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   2161536516ed ("media: media/pci: set device_caps in struct video_device")
> 
> from the v4l-dvb tree and commit:
> 
>   deb00d2785be ("fbdev: make unregister/unlink functions not fail")
> 
> from the fbdev tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtvfb.c
> index 800b3654cac5,299ff032f528..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtvfb.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtvfb.c
> @@@ -1251,16 -1246,7 +1251,12 @@@ static int ivtvfb_callback_cleanup(stru
>   	struct osd_info *oi = itv->osd_info;
>   
>   	if (itv->v4l2_cap & V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_OUTPUT) {
>  +		itv->streams[IVTV_DEC_STREAM_TYPE_YUV].vdev.device_caps &=
>  +			~V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_OUTPUT_OVERLAY;
>  +		itv->streams[IVTV_DEC_STREAM_TYPE_MPG].vdev.device_caps &=
>  +			~V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_OUTPUT_OVERLAY;
>  +		itv->v4l2_cap &= ~V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_OUTPUT_OVERLAY;
> - 		if (unregister_framebuffer(&itv->osd_info->ivtvfb_info)) {
> - 			IVTVFB_WARN("Framebuffer %d is in use, cannot unload\n",
> - 				       itv->instance);
> - 			return 0;
> - 		}
> + 		unregister_framebuffer(&itv->osd_info->ivtvfb_info);
>   		IVTVFB_INFO("Unregister framebuffer %d\n", itv->instance);
>   		itv->ivtvfb_restore = NULL;
>   		ivtvfb_blank(FB_BLANK_VSYNC_SUSPEND, &oi->ivtvfb_info);

I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ