[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f24f8ea9-86ba-adbd-2ba8-9fe9de56593d@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:48:37 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] watchdog: sama5d4: fix WDD value to be always set
to max
On 7/9/19 12:26 AM, Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com wrote:
> From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
>
> WDD value must be always set to max (0xFFF) otherwise the hardware
> block will reset the board on the first ping of the watchdog.
>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
This patch is already in -next as of today.
Guenter
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> index b8da1bf..5afe10c 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> @@ -110,9 +110,7 @@ static int sama5d4_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
> u32 value = WDT_SEC2TICKS(timeout);
>
> wdt->mr &= ~AT91_WDT_WDV;
> - wdt->mr &= ~AT91_WDT_WDD;
> wdt->mr |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDV(value);
> - wdt->mr |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDD(value);
>
> /*
> * WDDIS has to be 0 when updating WDD/WDV. The datasheet states: When
> @@ -248,7 +246,7 @@ static int sama5d4_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> timeout = WDT_SEC2TICKS(wdd->timeout);
>
> - wdt->mr |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDD(timeout);
> + wdt->mr |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDD(WDT_SEC2TICKS(MAX_WDT_TIMEOUT));
> wdt->mr |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDV(timeout);
>
> ret = sama5d4_wdt_init(wdt);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists