linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivers: spi: core: Add optional stall delay between cs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 15:12:28 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
Cc:     Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivers: spi: core: Add optional stall delay between
 cs_change transfers

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 07:34:38PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:13:25 +0300
> Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> 
> > Some devices like the ADIS16460 IMU require a stall period between
> > transfers, i.e. between when the CS is de-asserted and re-asserted. The
> > default value of 10us is not enough. This change makes the delay
> > configurable for when the next CS change goes active.

This looks like cs_change_delay.

As documented in SubmittingPatches please send patches to the 
maintainers for the code you would like to change.  The normal kernel
workflow is that people apply patches from their inboxes, if they aren't
copied they are likely to not see the patch at all and it is much more
difficult to apply patches.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)