[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190709111833.7fa42a2f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:18:33 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 12/16] kprobes: Initialize kprobes at
postcore_initcall
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 21:51:24 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Masami,
> >
> > If you give me an Acked-by, I'll add it to my tree.
>
> Sorry for late reply, but I want to keep the test running right after
> initialization as the first user of kprobes at that timing, since
> other user can start using kprobes right after init_kprobes().
> So this issue must be fixed in moving the init_kprobes() itself
> right after arch_initcall() (and that is subsys_initcall)
>
> Catalin, Mark, could you ensure the below patch can fix your issue?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190625191545.245259106@goodmis.org/
>
> And if so, Steve, could you push above one (which seems already in your
> tree) to next as a fix?
Bah, I forgot to push. I usually do that right after I send the series.
I just pushed to my for-next branch:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git
Can you see if that fixes the issue. If so, then we don't need to do
anything.
Thanks!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists