lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:10:16 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     NitinGote <nitin.r.gote@...el.com>, corbet@....net
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, apw@...onical.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Added warnings in checkpatch.pl script to :

On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 21:18 +0530, NitinGote wrote:
> From: Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@...el.com>
> 
> 1. Deprecate strcpy() in favor of strscpy().
> 2. Deprecate strlcpy() in favor of strscpy().
> 3. Deprecate strncpy() in favor of strscpy() or strscpy_pad().
> 
> Updated strncpy() section in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> to cover strscpy_pad() case.

Please slow down your patch submission rate for
this instance and respond appropriately to the
comments you've been given.

This stuff is not critical bug fixing.

The subject could be something like:

Subject: [PATCH v#] Documentation/checkpatch: Prefer strscpy over strcpy/strlcpy

> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -605,6 +605,20 @@ foreach my $entry (keys %deprecated_apis) {
>  }
>  $deprecated_apis_search = "(?:${deprecated_apis_search})";
> 
> +our %deprecated_string_apis = (
> +        "strcpy"				=> "strscpy",
> +        "strlcpy"				=> "strscpy",
> +        "strncpy"				=> "strscpy, strscpy_pad or for non-NUL-terminated strings, strncpy() can still be used, but destinations should be marked with the __nonstring",

'the' is not necessary.

There could likely also be a strscat created for
strcat, strlcat and strncat.

btw:

There were several defects in the kernel for misuses
of strlcpy.

Did you or anyone else have an opinion on stracpy
to avoid duplicating the first argument in a
sizeof()?

	strlcpy(foo, bar, sizeof(foo))
to
	stracpy(foo, bar)

where foo must be char array compatible ?

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d1524130f91d7cfd61bc736623409693d2895f57.camel@perches.com/



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ